Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Predictive analytics in health care has generated increasing enthusiasm recently, as reflected in a rapidly growing body of predictive models reported in literature and in real-time embedded models using electronic health record data. However, estimating the benefit of applying any single model to a specific clinical problem remains challenging today. Developing a shared framework for estimating model value is therefore critical to facilitate the effective, safe, and sustainable use of predictive tools into the future. We highlight key concepts within the prediction-action dyad that together are expected to impact model benefit. These include factors relevant to model prediction (including the number needed to screen) as well as those relevant to the subsequent action (number needed to treat). In the simplest terms, a number needed to benefit contextualizes the numbers needed to screen and treat, offering an opportunity to estimate the value of a clinical predictive model in action.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Vincent X. Liu
David W. Bates
Jenna Wiens
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Harvard University
Stanford University
University of Michigan
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a111fc6adcbc0f86c011b38 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz088