Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) provides a principled general framework for planning under uncertainty, but solving POMDPs optimally is computationally intractable, due to the "curse of dimensionality" and the "curse of history". To overcome these challenges, we introduce the Determinized Sparse Partially Observable Tree (DESPOT), a sparse approximation of the standard belief tree, for online planning under uncertainty. A DESPOT focuses online planning on a set of randomly sampled scenarios and compactly captures the "execution" of all policies under these scenarios. We show that the best policy obtained from a DESPOT is near-optimal, with a regret bound that depends on the representation size of the optimal policy. Leveraging this result, we give an anytime online planning algorithm, which searches a DESPOT for a policy that optimizes a regularized objective function. Regularization balances the estimated value of a policy under the sampled scenarios and the policy size, thus avoiding overfitting. The algorithm demonstrates strong experimental results, compared with some of the best online POMDP algorithms available. It has also been incorporated into an autonomous driving system for real-time vehicle control. The source code for the algorithm is available online.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nan Ye
Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics
Adhiraj Somani
Queensland University of Technology
David Hsu
National University of Singapore
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
National University of Singapore
Queensland University of Technology
ARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ye et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1097791406dce28afcc0e7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.5328
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: