Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
There is an imperative worldwide need to identify effective approaches to deal with water-related risks, and mainly with increasingly frequent floods, as well as with severe droughts. Particularly, policy and decision-makers are trying to identify systemic strategies that, going beyond the mere risk reduction, should be capable to deal simultaneously with multiple challenges (such as climate resilience, health and well-being, quality of life), thus providing additional benefits. In this direction, the contribution of Nature Based Solutions (NBS) is relevant, although their wider implementation is still hampered by several barriers, such as the uncertainty and lack of information on their long-term behavior and the difficulty of quantitatively valuing their multidimensional impacts. The activities described in the present paper, carried out within the EU funded project NAIAD, mainly aim at developing a participatory System Dynamic Model capable to quantitatively assess the effectiveness of NBS to deal with flood risks, while producing a multiplicity of co-benefits. The adoption of a participatory approach supported both to increase the available knowledge and the awareness about the potential of NBS and hybrid measures (e.g. a combination of NBS and socio-institutional ones). Specific reference is made to one of the demos of the NAIAD project, namely the Glinščica river case study (Slovenia).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Alessandro Pagano
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari
Irene Pluchinotta
University College London
Polona Pengal
Smith Institute
The Science of The Total Environment
King's College London
National Research Council
London Business School
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pagano et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1079c38090e499da613ab7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.059
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: