Expanded short tandem repeat RNAs in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 form toxic nuclear foci that sequester Muscleblind-like proteins, leading to global dysregulation of RNA processing.
This review highlights the RNA-mediated pathomechanisms of myotonic dystrophy, emphasizing the role of RNA foci and MBNL protein sequestration as reversible targets for therapeutic intervention.
Short tandem repeat (STR) or microsatellite, expansions underlie more than 50 hereditary neurological, neuromuscular and other diseases, including myotonic dystrophy types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2). Current disease models for DM1 and DM2 propose a common pathomechanism, whereby the transcription of mutant DMPK (DM1) and CNBP (DM2) genes results in the synthesis of CUG and CCUG repeat expansion (CUGexp, CCUGexp) RNAs, respectively. These CUGexp and CCUGexp RNAs are toxic since they promote the assembly of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes or RNA foci, leading to sequestration of Muscleblind-like (MBNL) proteins in the nucleus and global dysregulation of the processing, localization and stability of MBNL target RNAs. STR expansion RNAs also form phase-separated gel-like droplets both in vitro and in transiently transfected cells, implicating RNA-RNA multivalent interactions as drivers of RNA foci formation. Importantly, the nucleation and growth of these nuclear foci and transcript misprocessing are reversible processes and thus amenable to therapeutic intervention. In this review, we provide an overview of potential DM1 and DM2 pathomechanisms, followed by a discussion of MBNL functions in RNA processing and how multivalent interactions between expanded STR RNAs and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) promote RNA foci assembly.
Sznajder et al. (Tue,) conducted a review in Myotonic dystrophy types 1 (DM1) and 2 (DM2). Expanded short tandem repeat RNAs in myotonic dystrophy types 1 and 2 form toxic nuclear foci that sequester Muscleblind-like proteins, leading to global dysregulation of RNA processing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: