Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
be diagnosed if symptoms are accounted for by ID or general developmental delay. We review the evolution of the autism diagnosis and ASD diagnostic tools to understand how this distinction has been conceptualized previously. We then consider ways that operationalized criteria may be beneficial for making the clinical distinction between ID with and without ASD. Finally, we consider the impact of the blurred diagnostic boundaries between ID and ASD on the study of secondary versus idiopathic ASD. Especially pertinent to this discussion are findings that a diagnosis of ID in the context of an ASD diagnosis may be one of the strongest indicators that an associated condition or specific etiological factor is present (i.e., secondary autism).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Audrey Thurm
Cristan Farmer
Emma Salzman
Frontiers in Psychiatry
National Institutes of Health
University of California, San Francisco
National Institute of Mental Health
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thurm et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fc2ce17861a3c0be78d540 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00526