Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper focuses on the OECD’s PISA 2018 international framework for global competence. Given the growing national and international attention on educating for global competence, and absent of other measures, there is a need to scrutinise this framework. Our critical analysis is conceptually framed by academic literature related to (a) the OECD’s influential role in facilitating neoliberal education policy trends, (b) disjuncture and debate surrounding global competence, and (c) how influence is garnered through measurement technologies. We conclude by encouraging the OECD to be transparent in the reporting of results and educational stakeholders to be cautious interpreters of forthcoming results and rankings.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Laura Engel
David Rutkowski
Greg Thompson
Globalisation Societies and Education
Indiana University Bloomington
George Washington University
Queensland University of Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Engel et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d8424fd56ca42147d17e03 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1642183
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: