Exaggerated blood pressure in endurance-trained athletes did not affect vascular-ventricular coupling during exercise, but was associated with higher left ventricular end-systolic elastance (P<0.001).
Cross-Sectional (n=28)
28 middle-aged endurance-trained men and women (50% female) with and without exaggerated blood pressure responses evaluated during steady-state cycling.
Exaggerated blood pressure (EBP) response vs No exaggerated blood pressure (EBP-)
Left ventricular end-systolic elastance index (ELVI) at stage 2 exercise (130-140 beats/min), p=<0.001
Absolute Event Rate: 10.3% vs 8%
p-value: p=<0.001
This study sought to examine whether cardiovascular performance during exercise, assessed using the vascular-ventricular coupling index (VVC), was affected by exaggerated blood pressure (EBP) responses in endurance-trained athletes. Subjects were middle-aged endurance-trained men and women. Blood pressure measurements and left ventricular echocardiography were performed in a semiupright position at rest and during steady-state cycling at workloads that elicited 100–110 beats/min ( stage 1) and 130–140 beats/min ( stage 2). These data were used to calculate effective arterial elastance index ( E a I), left ventricular end-systolic elastance index ( E LV I), and their ratio (VVC). Additional measurements of left ventricular volumes and function (i.e., stroke volume, cardiac output, and longitudinal strain) and indirect assessments of peripheral vascular function (i.e., total arterial compliance and peripheral vascular resistance) were examined. Fourteen subjects with EBP (EBP+, 50% men) and 14 sex-matched subjects without EBP (EBP−) participated, with results presented as EBP+ versus EBP−. E a I and E LV I increased from rest to exercise while VVC decreased, but only E LV I was different between groups at stage 1 7.6 (1.8) vs. 6.4 (1.0) mmHg·ml −1 ·m −2 , P = 0.045 and stage 2 10.3 (1.6) vs. 8.0 (1.7) mmHg·ml −1 ·m −2 , P < 0.001. Additional comparisons revealed no group difference in the contribution of the Frank-Starling mechanism or left ventricular and peripheral vascular function during exercise. The cardiovascular adjustment to exercise in athletes with EBP is achieved through a matched increase in both E a I and E LV I, and the absence of between-group differences in left ventricular or peripheral vascular function suggests that other factors may contribute to the EBP response. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Cardiovascular performance during submaximal exercise, assessed using vascular-ventricular coupling, is unaffected by exaggerated blood pressure (EBP) responses in endurance-trained athletes. The underlying mechanisms of EBP in athletes remain unknown as changes in left ventricular and peripheral vascular function during exercise were similar in athletes with and without EBP.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Katharine D. Currie
Michigan State University
Zion Sasson
Mount Sinai Hospital
Jack M. Goodman
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Journal of Applied Physiology
University of Toronto
Michigan State University
University Health Network
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Currie et al. (Thu,) conducted a cross-sectional in Exaggerated blood pressure response (n=28). Exaggerated blood pressure (EBP) response vs. No exaggerated blood pressure (EBP-) was evaluated on Left ventricular end-systolic elastance index (ELVI) at stage 2 exercise (130-140 beats/min) (p=<0.001). Exaggerated blood pressure in endurance-trained athletes did not affect vascular-ventricular coupling during exercise, but was associated with higher left ventricular end-systolic elastance (P<0.001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1feed975fc4a116b2e5447 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00108.2019
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: