Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Foreground map evaluation is crucial for gauging the progress of object segmentation algorithms, in particular in the field of salient object detection where the purpose is to accurately detect and segment the most salient object in a scene. Several widely-used measures such as Area Under the Curve (AUC), Average Precision (AP) and the recently proposed F W/B (Fbw) have been used to evaluate the similarity between a non-binary saliency map (SM) and a ground-truth (GT) map. These measures are based on pixel-wise errors and often ignore the structural similarities. Behavioral vision studies, however, have shown that the human visual system is highly sensitive to structures in scenes. Here, we propose a novel, efficient, and easy to calculate measure known as structural similarity measure (Structure-measure) to evaluate non-binary foreground maps. Our new measure simultaneously evaluates region-aware and object-aware structural similarity between a SM and a GT map. We demonstrate superiority of our measure over existing ones using 5 meta-measures on 5 benchmark datasets.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Deng-Ping Fan
Ming‐Ming Cheng
Yun Liu
Nankai University
Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fan et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d847b35c3030ff03d19a78 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/iccv.2017.487
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: