Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Citation metrics are widely used and misused. We have created a publicly available database of 100,000 top scientists that provides standardized information on citations, h-index, coauthorship-adjusted hm-index, citations to papers in different authorship positions, and a composite indicator. Separate data are shown for career-long and single-year impact. Metrics with and without self-citations and ratio of citations to citing papers are given. Scientists are classified into 22 scientific fields and 176 subfields. Field- and subfield-specific percentiles are also provided for all scientists who have published at least five papers. Career-long data are updated to end of 2017 and to end of 2018 for comparison.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John P. A. Ioannidis
Jeroen Baas
Richard Klavans
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
PLoS Biology
Stanford University
RELX Group (Netherlands)
Protein Metrics (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ioannidis et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dc33c58bac30e30e9f54fa — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: