The HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm accurately distinguishes HFpEF, with a score of ≥5 points indicating definite diagnosis, while ≤1 point suggests it's unlikely.
How should heart failure with preserved ejection fraction be diagnosed using a stepwise clinical and imaging approach?
Patients with suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
HFA-PEFF diagnostic algorithm (4-step process: Pre-test assessment, Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score, Functional testing, Final aetiology)
Diagnosis of HFpEF
The HFA-PEFF algorithm provides a standardized, stepwise consensus recommendation for diagnosing HFpEF using clinical, echocardiographic, biomarker, and functional assessments.
Abstract Making a firm diagnosis of chronic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains a challenge. We recommend a new stepwise diagnostic process, the ‘HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm’. Step 1 (P=Pre-test assessment) is typically performed in the ambulatory setting and includes assessment for HF symptoms and signs, typical clinical demographics (obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elderly, atrial fibrillation), and diagnostic laboratory tests, electrocardiogram, and echocardiography. In the absence of overt non-cardiac causes of breathlessness, HFpEF can be suspected if there is a normal left ventricular ejection fraction, no significant heart valve disease or cardiac ischaemia, and at least one typical risk factor. Elevated natriuretic peptides support, but normal levels do not exclude a diagnosis of HFpEF. The second step (E: Echocardiography and Natriuretic Peptide Score) requires comprehensive echocardiography and is typically performed by a cardiologist. Measures include mitral annular early diastolic velocity (e′), left ventricular (LV) filling pressure estimated using E/e′, left atrial volume index, LV mass index, LV relative wall thickness, tricuspid regurgitation velocity, LV global longitudinal systolic strain, and serum natriuretic peptide levels. Major (2 points) and Minor (1 point) criteria were defined from these measures. A score ≥5 points implies definite HFpEF; ≤1 point makes HFpEF unlikely. An intermediate score (2–4 points) implies diagnostic uncertainty, in which case Step 3 (F1: Functional testing) is recommended with echocardiographic or invasive haemodynamic exercise stress tests. Step 4 (F2: Final aetiology) is recommended to establish a possible specific cause of HFpEF or alternative explanations. Further research is needed for a better classification of HFpEF.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Burkert Pieske
Carsten Tschöpe
Rudolf A. de Boer
European Heart Journal
Harvard University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Inserm
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pieske et al. (Tue,) reported a other. The HFA–PEFF diagnostic algorithm accurately distinguishes HFpEF, with a score of ≥5 points indicating definite diagnosis, while ≤1 point suggests it's unlikely.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/698cd0ae244806f74a10729d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz641