Single time point screening for atrial fibrillation in individuals aged ≥65 years yielded a detection rate of 1.44%, with 84% of new cases having a Class-1 recommendation for oral anticoagulation.
Meta-Analysis (n=141,220)
Yes
Atrial fibrillation (n=141,220)
Single time point screening vs Age <65 years
Detection rate of new atrial fibrillation in people aged ≥65 years — RR 3.57 (3.10-4.10)
Effect estimate: RR 3.57 (95% CI 3.10-4.10)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.44% vs 0.41%
BACKGROUND: The precise age distribution and calculated stroke risk of screen-detected atrial fibrillation (AF) is not known. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the number needed to screen (NNS) to identify one treatable new AF case (NNS-Rx) (i.e., Class-1 oral anticoagulation OAC treatment recommendation) in each age stratum. If the NNS-Rx is known for each age stratum, precise cost-effectiveness and sensitivity simulations can be performed based on the age distribution of the population/region to be screened. Such calculations are required by national authorities and organisations responsible for health system budgets to determine the best age cutoffs for screening programs and decide whether programs of screening should be funded. Therefore, we aimed to determine the exact yield and calculated stroke-risk profile of screen-detected AF and NNS-Rx in 5-year age strata. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A systematic review of Medline, Pubmed, and Embase was performed (January 2007 to February 2018), and AF-SCREEN international collaboration members were contacted to identify additional studies. Twenty-four eligible studies were identified that performed a single time point screen for AF in a general ambulant population, including people ≥65 years. Authors from eligible studies were invited to collaborate and share patient-level data. Statistical analysis was performed using random effects logistic regression for AF detection rate, and Poisson regression modelling for CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Nineteen studies (14 countries from a mix of low- to middle- and high-income countries) collaborated, with 141,220 participants screened and 1,539 new AF cases. Pooled yield of screening was greater in males across all age strata. The age/sex-adjusted detection rate for screen-detected AF in ≥65-year-olds was 1.44% (95% CI, 1.13%-1.82%) and 0.41% (95% CI, 0.31%-0.53%) for 70% have ≥1 additional stroke risk factor other than age/sex. Our data, based on the largest number of screen-detected AF collected to date, show the precise relationship between yield and estimated stroke risk profile with age, and strong dependence for NNS-RX on the age distribution of the population to be screened: essential information for precise cost-effectiveness calculations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicole Lowres
Electrophysiology
Jake Olivier
UNSW Sydney
Tze‐Fan Chao
Electrophysiology
PLoS Medicine
University of Oxford
University of Cambridge
The University of Sydney
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lowres et al. (Wed,) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation (n=141,220). Single time point screening vs. Age <65 years was evaluated on Detection rate of new atrial fibrillation in people aged ≥65 years (RR 3.57, 95% CI 3.10-4.10). Single time point screening for atrial fibrillation in individuals aged ≥65 years yielded a detection rate of 1.44%, with 84% of new cases having a Class-1 recommendation for oral anticoagulation.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1635687720a05aca78dbbe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002903
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: