Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background Recently, there has been mounting evidence suggesting the efficacy of steroid‐eluting stents (SES) for management of chronic rhinosinusitis after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). This meta‐analysis serves to evaluate the efficacy of SES in improving postoperative outcomes after ESS. Methods A systematic literature search was performed of PubMed for articles published between 1985 and 2018. The outcome variables were reported at, on average, 30 days postintervention. Results Seven of the 76 published studies, all of which were industry‐sponsored, were included for a collective cohort of 444 SES and 444 control sinuses. In patients who received SES vs controls, collective odds ratios (ORs) for postoperative need for intervention, surgery, and oral steroid were 0.45 (95% confidence interval CI, 0.33‐0.62; p < 0.001), 0.30 (95% CI, 0.18‐0.52; p < 0.001), and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.40‐0.84; p = 0.004), respectively. In addition, collective ORs for frontal sinus ostia (FSO) patency, moderate‐to‐severe adhesion/scarring, and increase in polyp score were 2.53 (95% CI, 1.61‐3.97; p < 0.001), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.13‐0.59; p < 0.001), and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.25‐0.74; p = 0.002), respectively. Collective mean differences for FSO/ethmoid inflammation and FSO diameter were −10.86 mm ( p < 0.001) and +1.34 mm ( p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion Aggregate evidence suggests that SES can improve ESS outcomes by reducing rates of postoperative intervention and recurrent polyposis and inflammation, while promoting FSO patency. All included and analyzed studies were industry‐sponsored and ruling‐out publication bias was not possible. Future independent and nonsponsored studies to further evaluate SES's long‐term efficacy are warranted.
Goshtasbi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.