Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
, 2018. We synthesized the results of the studies narratively by comparing statistical significance and direction of different nudge types' effects on primary study outcomes. Lastly, we categorized the nudges according to their degree of manipulation and transparency. We identified 26 studies, where 13 were of high or moderate quality. The most commonly tested nudges were reminders, planning prompts, small financial incentives, and feedback. Overall, 8 of 9 studies with a high or moderate quality ranking, focused on self-management outcomes, i.e., physical activity, attendance, self-monitoring, and medication adherence, found that nudges had significant positive effects. However, only 1 of 4 studies of high or moderate quality, analyzing disease control outcomes (e.g., glycemic control), found that nudges had a significant positive effect for one intervention arm. In summary, this review demonstrates that nudges can improve chronic disease self-management, but there is hardly any evidence to date that these interventions lead to improved disease control. Reminders, feedback, and planning prompts appear to improve chronic disease self-management most consistently and are among the least controversial types of nudges. Accordingly, they can generally be recommended to policymakers.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Meilin Möllenkamp
Universität Hamburg
Maike Zeppernick
Universität Hamburg
Jonas Schreyögg
Universität Hamburg
Health Policy
Universität Hamburg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Möllenkamp et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0079632ff633f36577f61f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.09.008