A random forest model predicted mortality (C-statistic 0.72; 95% CI 0.69-0.75) and heart failure hospitalization (C-statistic 0.76; 95% CI 0.71-0.81) in patients with HFpEF.
Observational
Can machine learning models accurately predict mortality and heart failure hospitalization in outpatients with HFpEF?
Machine learning models, particularly random forest, can effectively predict mortality and HF hospitalization in HFpEF patients, highlighting the prognostic importance of health status data like KCCQ scores.
Effect estimate: C-statistic 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.75)
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to develop models for predicting mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalization for outpatients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in the TOPCAT (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist) trial. BACKGROUND: Although risk assessment models are available for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction, few have assessed the risks of death and hospitalization in patients with HFpEF. METHODS: The following 5 methods: logistic regression with a forward selection of variables; logistic regression with a lasso regularization for variable selection; random forest (RF); gradient descent boosting; and support vector machine, were used to train models for assessing risks of mortality and HF hospitalization through 3 years of follow-up and were validated using 5-fold cross-validation. Model discrimination and calibration were estimated using receiver-operating characteristic curves and Brier scores, respectively. The top prediction variables were assessed by using the best performing models, using the incremental improvement of each variable in 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The RF was the best performing model with a mean C-statistic of 0.72 (95% confidence interval CI: 0.69 to 0.75) for predicting mortality (Brier score: 0.17), and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71 to 0.81) for HF hospitalization (Brier score: 0.19). Blood urea nitrogen levels, body mass index, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) subscale scores were strongly associated with mortality, whereas hemoglobin level, blood urea nitrogen, time since previous HF hospitalization, and KCCQ scores were the most significant predictors of HF hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: These models predict the risks of mortality and HF hospitalization in patients with HFpEF and emphasize the importance of health status data in determining prognosis. (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist TOPCAT; NCT00094302).
Angraal et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Machine learning risk assessment models (Random Forest) was evaluated on Mortality (C-statistic 0.72, 95% CI 0.69-0.75). A random forest model predicted mortality (C-statistic 0.72; 95% CI 0.69-0.75) and heart failure hospitalization (C-statistic 0.76; 95% CI 0.71-0.81) in patients with HFpEF.