Isometric handgrip training in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation patients yielded a negative mean regression for systolic blood pressure (-1.12) compared to controls (1.2) over weeks 1 to 7 (P=0.009).
RCT (n=11)
Does isometric handgrip training reduce resting blood pressure in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation patients?
A 6-week isometric handgrip training program did not yield a clear, overall significant reduction in blood pressure compared to no treatment in a very small cohort of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation patients.
Absolute Event Rate: -1.12% vs 1.2%
p-value: p=0.009
PURPOSE: Isometric handgrip (IHG) training lowers systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively), but the efficacy of IHG training in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation patients is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if IHG decreases blood pressure in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation patients. METHODS: Cardiopulmonary rehabilitation program participants (n = 11; 50-80 yr old) were randomized to IHG (n = 6) or control (CON; no treatment; n = 5) groups. IHG participants completed an IHG training program at 30% maximal voluntary contraction, 3 d/wk for 6 wk. Resting SBP, DBP, and heart rate were assessed weekly. RESULTS: Mean regression for SBP following IHG was negative (-1.04 ± 0.80). Mean regression in the CON group was positive (0.50 ± 0.88), but there was no significant difference between groups. Separate analysis of weeks 1 to 7 yielded a negative mean regression (-1.12 ± 0.54) in the IHG group, but positive (1.2 ± 0.60) in the CON group. A Wilcoxon test of these differences yielded significance for SBP (P = .009). In 3 of 6 IHG participants, SBP was lower (mean ± SD: -16 ± 11 mm Hg; P = .12), and in 2 IHG participants, DBP was lower (-9 ± 1 mm Hg; P = .06) compared with baseline. In 2 of 5 CON participants, SBP was not significantly lower (-11 ± 7 mm Hg) and, in 3 of 5 CON participants, DBP was lower (-7 ± 4 mm Hg; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that standard IHG training may be inadequate for blood pressure management immediately following a major cardiac or pulmonary event. Future work with a larger cohort and more developed training protocol to determine the efficacy of IHG training in patients with cardiopulmonary disease is warranted.
Gordon et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Cardiopulmonary disease (n=11). Isometric handgrip (IHG) training vs. Control (no treatment) was evaluated on Mean regression for systolic blood pressure (weeks 1 to 7) (p=0.009). Isometric handgrip training in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation patients yielded a negative mean regression for systolic blood pressure (-1.12) compared to controls (1.2) over weeks 1 to 7 (P=0.009).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: