Reperfusion therapies are critical for high-risk acute pulmonary embolism, whereas systemic thrombolysis is not recommended for intermediate-risk patients due to major bleeding risks.
Acute pulmonary embolism
Reperfusion therapies
Haemodynamic instability and right ventricular dysfunction are the key determinants of short-term prognosis in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Residual thrombi and persistent right ventricular dysfunction may contribute to post-PE functional impairment, and influence the risk of developing chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Patients with haemodynamic instability at presentation (high-risk PE) require immediate primary reperfusion to relieve the obstruction in the pulmonary circulation and increase the chances of survival. Surgical removal of the thrombi or catheter-directed reperfusion strategies is alternatives in patients with contraindications to systemic thrombolysis. For haemodynamically stable patients with signs of right ventricular overload or dysfunction (intermediate-risk PE), systemic standard-dose thrombolysis is currently not recommended, because the risk of major bleeding associated with the treatment outweighs its benefits. In such cases, thrombolysis should be considered only as a rescue intervention if haemodynamic decompensation develops. Catheter-directed pharmaco-logical and pharmaco-mechanical techniques ensure swift recovery of echocardiographic and haemodynamic parameters and may be characterized by better safety profile than systemic thrombolysis. For survivors of acute PE, little is known on the effects of reperfusion therapies on the risk of chronic functional and haemodynamic impairment. In intermediate-risk PE patients, available data suggest that systemic thrombolysis may have little impact on long-term symptoms and functional limitation, echocardiographic parameters, and occurrence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Ongoing and future interventional studies will clarify whether 'safer' reperfusion strategies may improve early clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of bleeding and contribute to reducing the burden of long-term complications after intermediate-risk PE.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Luca Valerio
Vascular Medicine
Frederikus A. Klok
Vascular Medicine
Stefano Barco
Vascular Medicine
European Heart Journal Supplements
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Valerio et al. (Fri,) conducted a review in Acute pulmonary embolism. Reperfusion therapies was evaluated. Reperfusion therapies are critical for high-risk acute pulmonary embolism, whereas systemic thrombolysis is not recommended for intermediate-risk patients due to major bleeding risks.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12f7cb257f24f1de9e98f4 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/suz222
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: