Continual arterial dP/dtmax monitoring was significantly correlated with left ventricular dP/dtmax assessed using echocardiography (r = 0.70) in patients with acute heart failure.
Observational (n=48)
Single-blind
No
Does arterial dP/dtmax correlate with echocardiographic LV dP/dtmax in patients with acute heart failure?
Continual measurement of arterial dP/dtmax from an arterial line provides a reliable, minimally invasive estimate of left ventricular contractility in acute heart failure patients, particularly those with cardiogenic shock profiles.
Effect estimate: r = 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.82)
p-value: p=<0.0001
Abstract Background Continuous, reliable evaluation of left ventricular (LV) contractile function in patients with advanced heart failure requiring intensive care remains challenging. Continual monitoring of dP/dt max from the arterial line has recently become available in hemodynamic monitoring. However, the relationship between arterial dP/dt max and LV dP/dt max remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the relationship between arterial dP/dt max and LV dP/dt max assessed using echocardiography in patients with acute heart failure. Methods Forty-eight patients (mean age 70.4 years 65% male) with acute heart failure requiring intensive care and hemodynamic monitoring were recruited. Hemodynamic variables, including arterial dP/dt max , were continually monitored using arterial line pressure waveform analysis. LV dP/dt max was assessed using continuous-wave Doppler analysis of mitral regurgitation flow. Results Values from continual arterial dP/dt max monitoring were significantly correlated with LV dP/dt max assessed using echocardiography ( r = 0.70 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51–0.82; P < 0.0001). Linear regression analysis revealed that LV dP/dt max = 1.25 × (arterial dP/dt max ) ( P < 0.0001). Arterial dP/dt max was also significantly correlated with stroke volume (SV) ( r = 0.63; P < 0.0001) and cardiac output (CO) ( r = 0.42; P = 0.0289). In contrast, arterial dP/dt max was not correlated with SV variation, dynamic arterial elastance, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance (SVR), or mean arterial pressure. Markedly stronger agreement between arterial and LV dP/dt max was observed in subgroups with higher SVR ( N = 28; r = 0.91; P < 0.0001), lower CO ( N = 26; r = 0.81; P < 0.0001), and lower SV ( N = 25; r = 0.60; P = 0.0014). A weak correlation was observed in the subjects with lower SVR ( N = 20; r = 0.61; P = 0.0004); in the subgroups with higher CO ( N = 22) and higher SV ( N = 23), no significant correlation was found. Conclusion Our results suggest that in patients with acute heart failure requiring intensive care with an arterial line, continuous calculation of arterial dP/dt max may be used for monitoring LV contractility, especially in those with higher SVR, lower CO, and lower SV, such as in patients experiencing cardiogenic shock. On the other hand, there was only a weak or no significant correlation in the subgroups with higher CO, higher SV, and lower SVR.
Ošťádal et al. (Thu,) conducted a observational in Acute heart failure (n=48). Arterial dP/dtmax monitoring vs. Echocardiographic LV dP/dtmax was evaluated on Correlation between arterial dP/dtmax and LV dP/dtmax (r = 0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.82, p=<0.0001). Continual arterial dP/dtmax monitoring was significantly correlated with left ventricular dP/dtmax assessed using echocardiography (r = 0.70) in patients with acute heart failure.