Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Spiritual care is a key domain of quality palliative care. Spiritual distress is highly prevalent in patients and their families facing serious illness. Guidelines support the ethical obligation of health care providers to attend to spiritual distress as part of total distress. All clinicians require education and support to provide this care to patients and their families facing serious illness. Objective: This project focused on the development of a curriculum for education of health care professionals in spiritual care. It was based on a consensus-derived generalist – specialist model of spiritual care, with all clinicians providing generalist – spiritual care and trained chaplains providing specialist spiritual care. Design: The curriculum was designed for classroom and online learning. Setting: The curriculum is appropriate for all clinical settings in the United States and internationally. Measurements: Needs assessment surveys and course evaluation data have provided a basis on which to develop and refine the curriculum. This curriculum is built on a pilot Interprofessional Spiritual Care Education Curriculum (ISPEC) course held at the Veterans Administration, DC. Results: Needs assessment and course evaluation data support the ISPEC course content. Conclusions: The ISPEC curricula serve as a much-needed training resource to improve spiritual care for all people with serious illness.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Christina M. Puchalski
George Washington University
Najmeh Jafari
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Haley Buller
James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital
Journal of Palliative Medicine
George Washington University
City Of Hope National Medical Center
Smith College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Puchalski et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a18738ccc5c8ef9ac65c9ec — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0375
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: