Does biphasic PFA prevent chronic histopathologic esophageal changes compared to RFA in a porcine model of esophageal injury?
porcine model of esophageal injury
biphasic Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA)
Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA)
chronic histopathologic esophageal changessafety
In a porcine model, biphasic PFA appears safer for the esophagus than RFA, causing no chronic histopathologic changes.
In this novel porcine model of esophageal injury, biphasic PFA induced no chronic histopathologic esophageal changes, while RFA demonstrated a spectrum of esophageal lesions including fistula and deep esophageal ulcers and abscesses.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jacob S. Koruth
Electrophysiology
Kenji Kuroki
Electrophysiology
Iwanari Kawamura
Electrophysiology
Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology
Na Homolce Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Koruth et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69db1a20498b35d3e6a3c3b9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circep.119.008303
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: