Left bundle branch area pacing resulted in a significantly shorter terminal R' wave duration in lead V1 compared to native right bundle branch block (51 ± 12 ms vs 85 ± 19 ms, p < 0.001).
Observational (n=64)
Indications for permanent cardiac pacing (n=64)
Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) vs Native right bundle branch block (RBBB)
Terminal R' wave duration in lead V1, p=< 0.001
Absolute Event Rate: 51% vs 85%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Abstract Aims In this study, we investigated the characteristics and underlying mechanisms of the electrocardiographic (ECG) morphology during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), which have not been systematically described. Methods Patients with indications for permanent cardiac pacing underwent LBBAP attempts. The ECGs of patients with confirmed left bundle branch (LBB) capture were compared with those of individuals with right bundle branch block (RBBB) on 12‐lead ECG. Intracardiac electrograms recorded during implantation were analyzed in all patients who underwent pacing. Results LBBAP was successfully achieved in 87.5% (56/64) of patients. The QRS morphologies in lead V 1 during LBBAP, which typically demonstrated Qr (60.7%), qR (19.6%), rSR’ (7.1%), or QS (12.5%) patterns, differed from those of native RBBB, which featured rsR’ (57.5%), M shape (23.7%), or monophasic R patterns (18.7%). The terminal R' wave duration in lead V 1 was significantly shorter during LBBAP than during native RBBB (51 ± 12 ms vs 85 ± 19 ms, p < 0.001). LBB potentials were recorded in 66.1% (37/56) of the LBBAP patients. No significant differences in ECG characteristics were found between LBBAP with and without recorded LBB potentials. The presence of bundle branch block during LBBAP significantly prolonged QRS duration, R wave peak time, and terminal R’ wave duration in lead V 1 . Conclusion LBBAP‐ECG patterns are characterized by a shorter terminal R’ wave duration in lead V 1 compared with that of native RBBB configurations. Bundle branch conduction integrity has an impact on ECG characteristics during LBBAP.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mingyang Gao
Shihezi University
Ying Tian
Qilu University of Technology
Liang Shi
Sun Yat-sen University
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Capital Medical University
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gao et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Indications for permanent cardiac pacing (n=64). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) vs. Native right bundle branch block (RBBB) was evaluated on Terminal R' wave duration in lead V1 (p=< 0.001). Left bundle branch area pacing resulted in a significantly shorter terminal R' wave duration in lead V1 compared to native right bundle branch block (51 ± 12 ms vs 85 ± 19 ms, p < 0.001).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0f8c0457bfcc72645faa7e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13884