Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Inherited arrhythmia syndromes have traditionally been viewed as monogenic forms of disease whose pathophysiology is driven by a single highly penetrant rare genetic variant. Although an accurate depiction of a proportion of genetic variants, the variable penetrance frequently noted in genotype positive families and the presence of sporadic genotype negative cases have long highlighted a more nuanced truth being operative. Coupled with our more recent recognition that many rare variants implicated in inherited arrhythmia syndromes possess unexpectedly high allele frequencies within the general population, these observations have contributed to the realization that a spectrum of pathogenicity exists among clinically relevant genetic variants. Notably, variable mutation pathogenicity and corresponding variable degrees of penetrance emphasize a limitation of contemporary guidelines, which attempt to dichotomize genetic variants as pathogenic or benign. Recognition of the existence of low and intermediate penetrant variants insufficient to be causative for disease in isolation has served to emphasize the importance of additional genetic, clinical, and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of rare inherited arrhythmia syndromes. Despite being rare, it has also become increasingly evident that common genetic variants play critical roles in both heritable channelopathies and cardiomyopathies and in aggregate may even be the primary drivers in certain instances, such as genotype negative Brugada syndrome. Our growing realization that the genetic substrates of inherited arrhythmia syndromes have intricacies that extend beyond traditionally perceived monogenic paradigms has highlighted a potential value of leveraging more comprehensive genomic risk scores for predicting disease development and arrhythmic risk.
Rowe et al. (Fri,) studied this question.