Los puntos clave no están disponibles para este artículo en este momento.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the serial interval of novel coronavirus (COVID-19) from information on 28 infector-infectee pairs. METHODS: We collected dates of illness onset for primary cases (infectors) and secondary cases (infectees) from published research articles and case investigation reports. We subjectively ranked the credibility of the data and performed analyses on both the full dataset (n = 28) and a subset of pairs with highest certainty in reporting (n = 18). In addition, we adjust for right truncation of the data as the epidemic is still in its growth phase. RESULTS: Accounting for right truncation and analyzing all pairs, we estimated the median serial interval at 4.0 days (95% credible interval CrI: 3.1, 4.9). Limiting our data to only the most certain pairs, the median serial interval was estimated at 4.6 days (95% CrI: 3.5, 5.9). CONCLUSIONS: The serial interval of COVID-19 is close to or shorter than its median incubation period. This suggests that a substantial proportion of secondary transmission may occur prior to illness onset. The COVID-19 serial interval is also shorter than the serial interval of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), indicating that calculations made using the SARS serial interval may introduce bias.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nishiura et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16df662fcf950e0005615c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2020.02.060
Hiroshi Nishiura
Kyoto University
Natalie M. Linton
California Department of Public Health
Andrei R. Akhmetzhanov
National Taiwan University
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Hokkaido University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: