Does one-month P2Y12 inhibitor therapy reduce bleeding compared to six-month therapy in AF patients requiring coronary stenting on aspirin and apixaban?
In AF patients undergoing coronary stenting, shortening P2Y12 inhibitor therapy to one month did not significantly reduce bleeding compared to six months, though the trial was underpowered due to early termination.
AIMS: We aimed to determine whether shortening the duration of P2Y12 inhibitor therapy can reduce the risk of bleeding without increasing the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events following coronary stenting in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: The SAFE-A is a randomised controlled trial that compared one-month and six-month P2Y12 inhibitor therapy, in combination with aspirin and apixaban for patients with AF who require coronary stenting. The primary endpoint was the incidence of any bleeding events, defined as Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction major/minor bleeding, bleeding with various Bleeding Academic Research Consortium grades, or bleeding requiring blood transfusion within 12 months after stenting. The study aimed to enrol 600 patients but enrolment was slow. Enrolment was terminated prematurely after enrolling 210 patients (72.7±8.2 years; 81% male). The incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ between the one-month and six-month groups (11.8% vs 16.0%; hazard ratio HR 0.70, 95% confidence interval CI: 0.33-1.47; p=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The study evaluated the safety of withdrawing the P2Y12 inhibitor from triple antithrombotic prescription one month after coronary stenting. However, enrolment was prematurely terminated because it was slow. Therefore, statistical power was not sufficient to assess the differences in the primary endpoint.
Hoshi et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: