Telemedicine home-based cardiac rehabilitation enabled two patients with barriers to facility-based care to successfully complete 36 and 30 sessions of cardiac rehabilitation.
Case Report (n=2)
No
Telemedicine home-based cardiac rehabilitation is a feasible alternative that addresses common barriers to participation in traditional facility-based programs.
DETAILS OF THE CLINICAL CASE: In this case series report, we review 2 patients who were among the first to participate in the Henry Ford telemedicine home-based cardiac rehabilitation (TM-HBCR) program. These patients had barriers to full participation in a facility-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) program due to return to work and access to transportation. However, they were willing and able to participate in the TM-HBCR program. DISCUSSION: The two cases discussed herein are examples of individuals who likely would not have fully participated in CR if the only option available was a facility-based program. While HBCR is not an option for all patients, it does address several barriers that are known to limit participation in facility-based CR for some individuals. SUMMARY: Technology has made it possible to provide the key components of a facility-based CR program through a TM-HBCR model using a secure connection to the patients via their personal mobile device.
Berry et al. (Tue,) conducted a case report in Myocardial infarction requiring cardiac rehabilitation (n=2). Telemedicine home-based cardiac rehabilitation (TM-HBCR) was evaluated on Program participation and completion. Telemedicine home-based cardiac rehabilitation enabled two patients with barriers to facility-based care to successfully complete 36 and 30 sessions of cardiac rehabilitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: