Intra-aortic balloon pump implantations in France decreased by 42% from 1725 in 2014 to 996 in 2018, while ECMO implantations increased by 44% over the same period.
Observational (n=18,940)
Yes
Despite a class III recommendation in the 2016 ESC guidelines, IABP use has declined but remains utilized in clinical practice in France, while ECMO use has significantly increased.
AIMS: Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) utilization was expected to be quickly abandoned following the IABP-shock trial and its class III, level B recommendation in the 2016 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of IABP compared with other mechanical support devices in a nationwide approach. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective study based on the French national hospital discharge database. All patients undergoing assist device implantation by IABP, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or IMPELLA® from 2014 to 2018 (2 years before/2 years after the 2016 guidelines) were included. The primary endpoint was the incidence of IABP implantation over the years. Secondary endpoints were incidence of total assist device, ECMO, and IMPELLA® implantations. From 2014 to 2018, a total of 18 940 patients benefited from mechanical support by IABP (n = 6657, 35.2%), ECMO (n = 11 881, 62.7%), or IMPELLA® (n = 402, 2.1%) in France. The incidence of total mechanical support implantations (ECMO and IABP) was constant over the years. IABP implantations decreased progressively from 1725 implantations in 2014 to 996 in 2018 (-42%). By contrast, ECMO implantations increased progressively from 1919 implantations in 2014 to 2763 implantations in 2018 (+44%). IMPELLA® implantations remained stable over the years from 63 (1.7%) implantations in 2014 to 83 (2.1%) in 2018. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationwide real-life study, despite a significant decline in IABP implantations over the years since the ESC guidelines, this device remained used in clinical practice with around 1000 implantations in 2018. The size of centres was not strictly correlated with this use, suggesting differential uses depending on the local background.
Akodad et al. (Sun,) conducted a observational in Patients requiring mechanical assist device implantation (n=18,940). Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) vs. ECMO and IMPELLA was evaluated on Incidence of IABP implantation over the years. Intra-aortic balloon pump implantations in France decreased by 42% from 1725 in 2014 to 996 in 2018, while ECMO implantations increased by 44% over the same period.