Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The emergence of the 2019 novel coronavirus has led to more than a pandemic—indeed, COVID-19 is spawning myriad other concerns as it rapidly marches around the globe. One of these concerns is a surge of misinformation, which we argue should be viewed as a risk in its own right, and to which insights from decades of risk communication research must be applied. Further, when the subject of misinformation is itself a risk, as in the case of COVID-19, we argue for the utility of viewing the problem as a multi-layered risk communication problem. In such circumstances, misinformation functions as a meta-risk that interacts with and complicates publics’ perceptions of the original risk. Therefore, as the COVID-19 “misinfodemic” intensifies, risk communication research should inform the efforts of key risk communicators. To this end, we discuss the implications of risk research for efforts to fact-check COVID-19 misinformation and offer practical recommendations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Nicole M. Krause
Morgridge Institute for Research
Isabelle Freiling
University of Utah
Becca Beets
University of Maryland, College Park
Journal of Risk Research
University of Wisconsin–Madison
University of Münster
Morgridge Institute for Research
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Krause et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a54dcac8a0d6c3ab4e8de — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385