Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
After decades of multiparty politics, Turkey is no longer a democracy. A theory-upending case, the country has descended into a competitive authoritarian regime under the Justice and Development Party ( Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi—AKP), despite rising income and education levels and strong links with the West. What accounts for democratic breakdown in such an unlikely case? Instead of ideological and institutional factors, we offer a political economy account. We contend that the coalitional ties that the AKP forged with businesses and the urban poor through the distribution of public resources has altered the cost of toleration for the party leadership and their dependent clients, while reducing the cost of suppression for incumbents. This new political calculus led to increasing authoritarianism of the AKP government through securitization of dissent, mounting repression, and systematic violation of civil liberties.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Berk Esen
Şebnem Gümüşçü
Party Politics
Bilkent University
Middlebury College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Esen et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69da2062b48bb130d46841d7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820923722
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: