Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We study the performance of eight representative in-memory subgraph matching algorithms. Specifically, we put QuickSI, GraphQL, CFL, CECI, DP-iso, RI and VF2++ in a common framework to compare them on the following four aspects: (1) method of filtering candidate vertices in the data graph; (2) method of ordering query vertices; (3) method of enumerating partial results; and (4) other optimization techniques. Then, we compare the overall performance of these algorithms with Glasgow, an algorithm based on the constraint programming. Through experiments, we find that (1) the filtering method of GraphQL is competitive to that of the latest algorithms CFL, CECI and DP-iso in terms of pruning power; (2) the ordering methods in GraphQL and RI are usually the most effective; (3) the set intersection based local candidate computation in CECI and DP-iso performs the best in the enumeration; and (4) the failing sets pruning in DP-iso can significantly improve the performance when queries become large. Our source code is publicly available at https://github.com/RapidsAtHKUST/SubgraphMatching.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shixuan Sun
Qiong Luo
Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sun et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69dd4b217d97b7e86940ca2a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3318464.3380581
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: