Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper aims to critically assess the information duties set out in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and national adaptations when the purpose of processing is scientific research. Due to the peculiarities of the legal regime applicable to the research context information about the processing plays a crucial role for data subjects. However, the analysis points out that the information obligations, or mandated disclosures, introduced in the GDPR are not entirely satisfying and present some flaws. In addition, the GDPR information duties risk suffering from the same shortcomings usually addressed in the literature about mandated disclosures. The paper argues that the principle of transparency, developed as a “user-centric” concept, can support the adoption of solutions that embed behavioural insights to support the rationale of the information provision better.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rossana Ducato
University of Aberdeen
Computer law & security review
UCLouvain Saint-Louis Brussels
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Rossana Ducato (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10445ad8db7e4a41fa87e6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105412
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: