Extensive occult cancer screening in patients with unprovoked VTE (where occult cancer detection is ~5% at 12 months) does not improve cancer-related mortality compared to limited screening.
Does an extensive occult cancer screening strategy decrease cancer-related mortality and morbidity and improve quality of life in patients with unprovoked VTE?
Routine extensive occult cancer screening is not recommended for patients with unprovoked VTE, as it does not improve mortality or quality of life compared to limited screening.
Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) can be the first sign of an occult cancer. The rate of occult cancer detection within 12 months of a newly diagnosed unprovoked VTE is approximately 5%. Therefore, it is appealing for clinicians to screen patients with unprovoked VTE for occult cancer, as it could potentially decrease cancer-related mortality and morbidity and improve quality of life. However, several randomized controlled trials have failed to report that an extensive occult cancer screening strategy (e.g., computed tomography of the abdomen/pelvis) is improving these patient-important outcomes. Therefore, clinical guidance documents suggest that patients should only undergo a limited screening strategy including a thorough medical history, physical examination, basic laboratory investigations (i.e., complete blood count and liver function tests), chest X-ray, as well as age- and gender-specific cancer screening (breast, cervical, colon and prostate). More intensive occult cancer screening including additional investigations is not routinely recommended. This narrative review will focus on the epidemiology, timing, and evidence regarding occult cancer detection in patients with unprovoked VTE.
D’Astous et al. (Mon,) conducted a review in Unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). Extensive occult cancer screening vs. Limited screening strategy was evaluated on Cancer-related mortality and morbidity. Extensive occult cancer screening in patients with unprovoked VTE (where occult cancer detection is ~5% at 12 months) does not improve cancer-related mortality compared to limited screening.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: