Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
OBJECTIVE: To examine and quantify the potential dose-response relation between intake of total, animal, and plant protein and the risk of mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus, and ISI Web of Science until December 2019, and references of retrieved relevant articles. STUDY SELECTION: Prospective cohort studies that reported the risk estimates for all cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality in adults aged 18 or older. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random effects models were used to calculate pooled effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals for the highest versus lowest categories of protein intake and to incorporate variation between studies. Linear and non-linear dose-response analyses were done to evaluate the dose-response relations between protein intake and mortality. RESULTS: =63.7%, P=0.001), but not with cancer mortality. Intake of total and animal protein was not significantly associated with risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer mortality. A dose-response analysis showed a significant inverse dose-response association between intake of plant protein and all cause mortality (P=0.05 for non-linearity). An additional 3% energy from plant proteins a day was associated with a 5% lower risk of death from all causes. CONCLUSIONS: Higher intake of total protein was associated with a lower risk of all cause mortality, and intake of plant protein was associated with a lower risk of all cause and cardiovascular disease mortality. Replacement of foods high in animal protein with plant protein sources could be associated with longevity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sina Naghshi
Omid Sadeghi
Walter C. Willett
BMJ
Harvard University
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Naghshi et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03691c8e99f25fb89bd32a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m2412
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: