Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In this article, the authors present the results from a structured review of the literature, identifying and analyzing the most quoted and dominant definitions of social media (SM) and alternative terms that were used between 1994 and 2019 to identify their major applications. Similarities and differences in the definitions are highlighted to provide guidelines for researchers and managers who use results from previous research to further study SM or to find practical applications. In other words, when reading an article about SM, it is essential to understand how the researchers defined SM and how results from articles that use different definitions can be compared. This article is intended to act as a guideline for readers of those articles.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Thomas Aichner
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Matthias Grünfelder
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Oswin Maurer
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
View
Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
John Cabot University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Aichner et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a00257b4716aad0cc859928 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0134