Do soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators reduce HF-related hospitalizations or mortality in patients with heart failure?
The addition of sGC stimulators (vericiguat and riociguat) to standard heart failure therapy shows no benefit in decreasing HF-related hospitalizations or mortality.
BACKGROUND: The utility of novel oral soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators (vericiguat and riociguat), in patients with reduced or preserved ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF/HFpEF) is currently unclear. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of sGC stimulators in HF patients. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Data on the safety and efficacy of sGC stimulators were compared using relative risk ratio (RR) on a random effect model. RESULTS: HFpEF) showed near identical rates for all safety and efficacy endpoints between the two groups at a mean follow-up of 19 wk. For the primary composite endpoint, the number needed to treat was 35, the number needed to harm was 44. CONCLUSION: The use of vericiguat and riociguat in conjunction with standard HF therapy, shows no benefit in terms of decreasing HF-related hospitalizations or mortality.
Ullah et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: