Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article considers the concept of natural capital as a basic construct of sustainable development. However, after numerous studies, a number of aspects of accounting and valuation of natural capital remain unspecified. The relevance and imperfection of the guidelines used to assess natural capital make relevant the development of such issues as the conceptual apparatus and methods to natural capital assessment. Therefore, the core objectives of the paper are: (1) to substantiate the structure of natural capital, taking into account the natural resources and ecosystem approaches; (2) to clarify the concepts of “function” and “services” in relation to abiotic and biotic components of the environment; (3) to generalize and analyze the classifications of ecosystem services, and to develop the authors’ classification; (4) to identify the most common methods for the economic assessment of natural capital’s components, and to implement these methods within a specific territory. These methods have been tested on the Khanty–Mansi Autonomous Okrug (KhMAD, Russia). The most typical ecosystems of the region and their inherent ecosystem services have been identified. Assessment results are presented for (1) forest ecosystems, (2) mountain ecosystems, and (3) ecosystems of swamps, lakes, and rivers.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Margarita Ignatyeva
V. V. Yurak
O. A. Logvinenko
Sustainability
Institute of Economics
Ural State Mining University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ignatyeva et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a03bc3d94ec7ec37ca9cca9 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219236
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: