Severe obesity in HFpEF patients was associated with higher absolute peak VO2, driven by a larger peak cardiac output (14.3 vs 11.0 L/min; p=0.012) and stroke volume reserve compared to lower BMI.
Cross-Sectional (n=32)
Does severe obesity alter exercise performance and its cardiac determinants in patients with HFpEF?
HFpEF patients with severe obesity have similar weight-indexed cardiorespiratory fitness but higher absolute VO2 driven by larger cardiac output and stroke volume reserve compared to those with lower BMI.
Absolute Event Rate: 14.3% vs 11%
p-value: p=0.012
Abstract Background Obesity plays an important role in functional impairment in HFpEF. The mechanisms underlying decreased functional capacity in obese HFpEF are not clear. We assessed the cardiac and peripheral determinants of exercise performance in HFpEF patients with class 2 obesity in the upright position, representative of posture when performing functional activities. Methods and Results Thirty‐two HFpEF patients were divided into two groups by presence of class 2 obesity (C2, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m 2 , n = 14) and non‐C2 (BMI < 35 kg/m 2 , n = 18). Participants performed a bout of submaximal exercise followed by incremental stages of treadmill exercise to determine peak aerobic power (peak VO 2 ). Peak VO 2 and Ve/VCO 2 were measured using Douglas bags while cardiac output (Qc) and stroke volume (SV) were measured by acetylene rebreathing. The C2 group were younger than the non‐C2 group (67 ± 6 versus 73 ± 6 years; p = .009). Comorbid condition burden was similar between groups. Peak VO 2 indexed to body mass was not significantly different between groups. Absolute peak VO 2 was higher in the C2 group secondary to a larger peak Qc (14.3 versus 11.0 L/min; p = .012). SV reserve was also higher in the C2 group (72 versus 49%; p = .038). Conclusion HFpEF patients with severe obesity had similar cardiorespiratory fitness compared to patients with lower BMI with similar comorbidity burden. Absolute VO 2 was actually higher in the severely obese driven by larger Qc and SV reserve arguing against significant effects from obesity per se on aerobic performance. The presence of a larger “cardiac engine” may offer potential for fat‐loss strategies to improve impairments in functional capacity in obese patients with HFpEF.
Sarma et al. (Sun,) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) (n=32). Class 2 obesity (BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2) vs. Non-class 2 obesity (BMI < 35 kg/m2) was evaluated on Peak cardiac output (Qc) (p=0.012). Severe obesity in HFpEF patients was associated with higher absolute peak VO2, driven by a larger peak cardiac output (14.3 vs 11.0 L/min; p=0.012) and stroke volume reserve compared to lower BMI.