Digital health interventions for cardiac rehabilitation demonstrate comparable efficacy to conventional CR in improving exercise capacity and program adherence.
Systematic Review
Do digital health interventions improve clinical and patient-reported outcomes compared to conventional cardiac rehabilitation?
31 studies (22 randomized controlled trials) evaluating patients eligible for cardiac rehabilitation. Median sample size per study was 98 (IQR 52.5-146).
Digital health interventions for cardiac rehabilitation (technology employed to deliver remote care beyond the use of telephone, including internet, wearable devices, and mobile apps).
Conventional facility-based cardiac rehabilitation or usual care.
Comprehensiveness of digital CR interventions and clinical outcomes including functional capacity, physical activity, self-efficacy, program adherence, weight management, dietary habits, quality of life, blood pressure, and mood.
Digital health interventions for cardiac rehabilitation are feasible and comparable to conventional CR for short-term outcomes like physical activity and quality of life, but evidence for long-term efficacy and comprehensive risk factor management remains limited.
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite strong evidence supporting the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation (CR), over 80% of eligible patients do not participate in CR. Digital health technologies (ie, the delivery of care using the internet, wearable devices, and mobile apps) have the potential to address the challenges associated with traditional facility-based CR programs, but little is known about the comprehensiveness of these interventions to serve as digital approaches to CR. Overall, there is a lack of a systematic evaluation of the current literature on digital interventions for CR. Objective The objective of this systematic literature review is to provide an in-depth analysis of the potential of digital health technologies to address the challenges associated with traditional CR. Through this review, we aim to summarize the current literature on digital interventions for CR, identify the key components of CR that have been successfully addressed through digital interventions, and describe the gaps in research that need to be addressed for sustainable and scalable digital CR interventions. Methods Our strategy for identifying the primary literature pertaining to CR with digital solutions (defined as technology employed to deliver remote care beyond the use of the telephone) included a consultation with an expert in the field of digital CR and searches of the PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for original studies published from January 1990 to October 2018. Results Our search returned 31 eligible studies, of which 22 were randomized controlled trials. The reviewed CR interventions primarily targeted physical activity counseling (31/31, 100%), baseline assessment (30/31, 97%), and exercise training (27/31, 87%). The most commonly used modalities were smartphones or mobile devices (20/31, 65%), web-based portals (18/31, 58%), and email-SMS (11/31, 35%). Approximately one-third of the studies addressed the CR core components of nutrition counseling, psychological management, and weight management. In contrast, less than a third of the studies addressed other CR core components, including the management of lipids, diabetes, smoking cessation, and blood pressure. Conclusions Digital technologies have the potential to increase access and participation in CR by mitigating the challenges associated with traditional, facility-based CR. However, previously evaluated interventions primarily focused on physical activity counseling and exercise training. Thus, further research is required with more comprehensive CR interventions and long-term follow-up to understand the clinical impact of digital interventions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shannon Wongvibulsin
Evagelia E Habeos
Pauline P. Huynh
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Stanford University
Johns Hopkins University
University of California, Los Angeles
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Wongvibulsin et al. (Mon,) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac Rehabilitation (n=31). Digital Health Interventions for Cardiac Rehabilitation vs. Conventional Cardiac Rehabilitation (CR) was evaluated on Exercise capacity. Digital health interventions for cardiac rehabilitation demonstrate comparable efficacy to conventional CR in improving exercise capacity and program adherence.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/696a9b33d1e26c3e8496f0f2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/18773