Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Automatic Charge Identification (ACI) is the task of identifying the relevant legal charges given the facts of a situation and the statutory laws that define these charges, and is a crucial aspect of the judicial process. Prior works focus on learning charge-side representations by modeling relationships between the charges, but not much effort has been made in improving fact-side representations. We observe that only a small fraction of sentences in the facts actually indicates the charges. We show that by using a very small subset (< 3%) of fact descriptions annotated with sentence-level charges, we can achieve an improvement across a range of different ACI models, as compared to modeling just the main document-level task on a much larger dataset. Additionally, we propose a novel model that utilizes sentence-level charge labels as an auxiliary task, coupled with the main task of document-level charge identification in a multi-task learning framework. The proposed model comprehensively outperforms a large number of recent baseline models for ACI. The improvement in performance is particularly noticeable for the rare charges which are known to be especially challenging to identify.
Paul et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: