Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Using questions expressly added to the Consumer Expenditure Survey, we estimate the change in consumption expenditures caused by the 2001 federal income tax rebates and test the permanent income hypothesis. We exploit the unique, randomized timing of rebate receipt across households. Households spent 20 to 40 percent of their rebates on nondurable goods during the three-month period in which their rebates arrived, and roughly two-thirds of their rebates cumulatively during this period and the subsequent three-month period. The implied effects on aggregate consumption demand are substantial. Consistent with liquidity constraints, responses are larger for households with low liquid wealth or low income.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David Johnson
Massachusetts General Hospital
Jonathan A. Parker
National Bureau of Economic Research
Nicholas S. Souleles
University of Pennsylvania
American Economic Review
University of Pennsylvania
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars
United States Census Bureau
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Johnson et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d801a93eff0c9dfaae3071 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1589
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: