Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper investigates four topics. (1) It examines the different roles played by the propensity score (the probability of selection into treatment) in matching, instrumental variable, and control function methods. (2) It contrasts the roles of exclusion restrictions in matching and selection models. (3) It characterizes the sensitivity of matching to the choice of conditioning variables and demonstrates the greater robustness of control function methods to misspecification of the conditioning variables. (4) It demonstrates the problem of choosing the conditioning variables in matching and the failure of conventional model selection criteria when candidate conditioning variables are not exogenous in a sense defined in this paper.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
James J. Heckman
Pepperdine University
Salvador Navarro
Western University
The Review of Economics and Statistics
University of Chicago
American Bar Foundation
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Heckman et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0252fcdd6c2a8c4fb363ea — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323023660