Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Even though some countries track students into differing‐ability schools by age 10, others keep their entire secondary‐school system comprehensive. To estimate the effects of such institutional differences in the face of country heterogeneity, we employ an international differences‐in‐differences approach. We identify tracking effects by comparing differences in outcome between primary and secondary school across tracked and non‐tracked systems. Six international student assessments provide eight pairs of achievement contrasts for between 18 and 26 cross‐country comparisons. The results suggest that early tracking increases educational inequality. While less clear, there is also a tendency for early tracking to reduce mean performance.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Eric A. Hanushek
Ludger W ößmann
The Economic Journal
Stanford University
Ifo Institute for Economic Research
Hoover Institution
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Hanushek et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d81ed452654bb436d182f2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2006.01076.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: