A novel deep learning method predicted 3D cardiovascular hemodynamics with approximately 90% accuracy compared to conventional computational fluid dynamics, while reducing calculation time 600-fold.
110 patients with coronary heart disease and left anterior descending artery stenosis whose CTA data was used to generate 1,100 cardiovascular models for hemodynamic simulation.
Deep learning network vs Computational fluid dynamics (CFD)
Prediction accuracy and computational time
The clinical treatment planning of coronary heart disease requires hemodynamic parameters to provide proper guidance. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is gradually used in the simulation of cardiovascular hemodynamics. However, for the patient-specific model, the complex operation and high computational cost of CFD hinder its clinical application. To deal with these problems, we develop cardiovascular hemodynamic point datasets and a dual sampling channel deep learning network, which can analyze and reproduce the relationship between the cardiovascular geometry and internal hemodynamics. The statistical analysis shows that the hemodynamic prediction results of deep learning are in agreement with the conventional CFD method, but the calculation time is reduced 600-fold. In terms of over 2 million nodes, prediction accuracy of around 90%, computational efficiency to predict cardiovascular hemodynamics within 1 second, and universality for evaluating complex arterial system, our deep learning method can meet the needs of most situations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gaoyang Li
Xuzhou Medical College
Haoran Wang
Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University
Mingzi Zhang
The University of Sydney
Communications Biology
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
Tohoku University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Li et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Coronary heart disease (n=110). Deep learning network vs. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) was evaluated on Prediction accuracy and computational time. A novel deep learning method predicted 3D cardiovascular hemodynamics with approximately 90% accuracy compared to conventional computational fluid dynamics, while reducing calculation time 600-fold.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a205ce9e9ca693ff1e73882 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01638-1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: