Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract This paper clarifies one of the puzzling results of the economic growth literature: the impact of military expenditure is frequently found to be non-significant or negative, yet most countries spend a large fraction of their GDP on defense and the military. We start by empirical evaluation of the non-linear interactions between military expenditure, external threats, corruption, and other relevant controls. While growth falls with higher levels of military spending, given the values of the other independent variables, we show that military expenditure in the presence of threats increases growth. We explain the presence of these non-linearities in an extended version of Barro and Sala-i-Martin (1995 Barro, R. J. and Sala-i-Martin, X. 1995. Economic Growth, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar), allowing the dependence of growth on the severity of external threats, and on the effective military expenditure associated with these threats.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joshua Aizenman
University of Southern California
Reuven Glick
Claremont McKenna College
Journal of International Trade & Economic Development
Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Aizenman et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a157c02b2e0231f15828ed1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09638190600689095