Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
BACKGROUND: Rearrangement is an important topic in the research of amphibian mitochondrial genomes ("mitogenomes" hereafter), whose causes and mechanisms remain enigmatic. Globally examining mitogenome rearrangements and uncovering their characteristics can contribute to a better understanding of mitogenome evolution. RESULTS: Here we systematically investigated mitogenome arrangements of 232 amphibians including four newly sequenced Dicroglossidae mitogenomes. The results showed that our new sequenced mitogenomes all possessed a trnM tandem duplication, which was not exclusive to Dicroglossidae. By merging the same arrangements, the mitogenomes of ~ 80% species belonged to the four major patterns, the major two of which were typical vertebrate arrangement and typical neobatrachian arrangement. Using qMGR for calculating rearrangement frequency (RF) (%), we found that the control region (CR) (RF = 45.04) and trnL2 (RF = 38.79) were the two most frequently rearranged components. Forty-seven point eight percentage of amphibians possessed rearranged mitogenomes including all neobatrachians and their distribution was significantly clustered in the phylogenetic trees (p < 0.001). In addition, we argued that the typical neobatrachian arrangement may have appeared in the Late Jurassic according to possible occurrence time estimation. CONCLUSION: It was the first global census of amphibian mitogenome arrangements from the perspective of quantity statistics, which helped us to systematically understand the type, distribution, frequency and phylogenetic characteristics of these rearrangements.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jifeng Zhang
Jinan University
Guopen Miao
Huainan Normal University
Shunjie Hu
Huainan Normal University
BMC Ecology and Evolution
Johns Hopkins University
Anhui Normal University
Yibin University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a170f5ac23c548e2a7bba6f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-021-01755-3
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: