Emergency nurses demonstrated significantly higher ECG interpretation competency scores compared to EMS personnel (6.65 vs 4.87 out of 10; p < 0.05).
Cross-Sectional (n=170)
Does ECG interpretation competency differ between emergency nurses and EMS personnel?
Hospital emergency nurses demonstrated higher ECG interpretation competency than pre-hospital EMS personnel, highlighting a need for continued education.
Absolute Event Rate: 6.65% vs 4.87%
p-value: p=<.05
AIMS: The aim of this research study was to compare electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation competency among emergency nurses and EMS personnel. DESIGN: A cross-sectional comparative descriptive study design was used. METHODS: This study recruited 170 participants (105 emergency nurses and 65 EMS personnel) in northwest of Iran. Data were collected during 2018 using ECG, an interpretation competency questionnaire and analysed using SPSS V.24 through independent t test, linear regression, Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficient. A statistical significance of p < .05 was assumed. RESULTS: The study results showed a mean score of 6.65 ± 2.16 out of 10 for emergency nurses' and 4.87 ± 1.81 for EMS personnel ECG interpretation competency (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Hospital emergency nurses were more qualified to interpret the ECG than the pre-hospital emergency medical personnel (p = .792 and β (SE)) = 0.22 (0.84). Active involvement in ECG interpretation and standard continued education are needed to develop and improve the emergency nurses and EMS personnel ECG interpretation competency.
Rahimpour et al. (Sun,) conducted a cross-sectional in ECG interpretation competency (n=170). Emergency nurses vs. EMS personnel was evaluated on ECG interpretation competency score (out of 10) (p=<.05). Emergency nurses demonstrated significantly higher ECG interpretation competency scores compared to EMS personnel (6.65 vs 4.87 out of 10; p < 0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: