Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Objective: Coercive control has traditionally been used as a concept to describe the coercive strategies used by perpetrators in intimate partner violence (IPV). Yet, these strategies are often experienced across a wide range of victimizations including child abuse, trafficking, IPV, sexual violence, and elder abuse. Professionals working with victims and/or perpetrators of coercive control are uniquely positioned to describe how they have observed coercive control in their clients, allowing for an examination of commonalities across victimization types. This study explored the perceptions of professionals who identified common tactics used by perpetrators to isolate, groom, and control individuals. Method: Key stakeholders (N = 22) with expertise working with perpetrators and victims of child abuse, elder abuse, IPV, human trafficking, and gang or cult recruitment completed semistructured interviews to discuss their perspectives of predatory tactics. Results: Using a directed content analysis procedure, emergent themes revealed that perpetrators engage individuals in exploitative relationships by (a) identifying potential victims, (b) infiltrating lives through grooming, (c) isolating to gain control, and (d) maintaining control through any means necessary. Conclusions: Although nuanced victimization experiences exist, professionals working with perpetrators and/or victims of abuse describe a common pattern of predatory strategies implemented by perpetrators that transcends victimization type. Applying the language of coercive control to these tactics broadens the recognition of instances when an individual’s personal freedoms are limited by another individual’s exertion of control. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)
Duron et al. (Thu,) studied this question.