Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Over the last century hundreds of studies have demonstrated that testing is an effective intervention to enhance long-term retention of studied knowledge and facilitate mastery of new information, compared with restudying and many other learning strategies (e.g., concept mapping), a phenomenon termed the testing effect. How robust is this effect in applied settings beyond the laboratory? The current review integrated 48,478 students' data, extracted from 222 independent studies, to investigate the magnitude, boundary conditions, and psychological underpinnings of test-enhanced learning in the classroom. The results show that overall testing (quizzing) raises student academic achievement to a medium extent (g = 0.499). The magnitude of the effect is modulated by a variety of factors, including learning strategy in the control condition, test format consistency, material matching, provision of corrective feedback, number of test repetitions, test administration location and timepoint, treatment duration, and experimental design. The documented findings support 3 theories to account for the classroom testing effect: additional exposure, transfer-appropriate processing, and motivation. In addition to their implications for theory development, these results have practical significance for enhancing teaching practice and guiding education policy and highlight important directions for future research. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Chunliang Yang
Beijing Normal University
Liang Luo
Beijing Normal University
Miguel A. Vadillo
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Psychological Bulletin
University College London
National University of Singapore
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yang et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a10c588d06b5b96589f7c5b — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309