Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of dyslipidemia among diabetes mellitus patients and predictors of optimal dyslipidemia control: results from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates of dyslipidemia and identify the predictors of optimal control (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol < 100 mg/dL) among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the representative Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014-2018). Overall, 4311 patients with DM, aged ≥19 years, and without cardiovascular diseases were selected, and the prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates of dyslipidemia were calculated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the factors influencing the optimal control of dyslipidemia. RESULTS: Dyslipidemia was prevalent in 83.3% of patients with DM, but the awareness and treatment rates were 36.5 and 26.9%, respectively. The control rate among all patients with dyslipidemia was 18.8%, whereas it was 61.1% among those being treated. Prevalence and awareness rates were also significantly higher in women than in men. Dyslipidemia was most prevalent in those aged 19-39 years, but the rates of awareness, treatment, and control among all patients with dyslipidemia in this age group were significantly lower than those in other age groups. The predictors of optimal control were age ≥ 40 years range 40-49 years: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.43-9.72; 50-59 years: aOR 6.25, 95% CI 2.50-15.65; 60-69 years: aOR 6.96, 95% CI 2.77-17.44; 70-79 years: aOR 9.21, 95% CI 3.58-23.74; and ≥ 80 years: aOR 4.43, 95% CI 1.60-12.27; urban living (aOR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15-1.80); higher body mass index (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.13-1.42); lower glycated hemoglobin levels (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.67-0.76); hypertension (aOR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22-1.92); poorer self-rated health status (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.62-0.84); and receiving regular health check-ups (aOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.25-2.00). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with DM were diagnosed with dyslipidemia, but many were unaware of or untreated for their condition. Therefore, their control rate was suboptimal. Thus, by understanding factors influencing optimal control of dyslipidemia, physicians should make more effort to encourage patients to undergo treatment and thus, adequately control their dyslipidemia.