Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background: Several genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with early childhood caries. However, they are highly age- and population-dependent and the majority of existing caries prediction models are based on environmental and behavioral factors only and are scarce in infants. Methods: We examined 6 novel and previously analyzed 22 SNPs in the cohort of 95 Polish children (48 caries, 47 caries-free) aged 2–3 years. All polymorphisms were genotyped from DNA extracted from oral epithelium samples. We used Fisher’s exact test, receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve and uni-/multi-variable logistic regression to test the association of SNPs with the disease, followed by the neural network (NN) analysis. Results: The logistic regression (LogReg) model showed 90% sensitivity and 96% specificity, overall accuracy of 93% (p < 0. 0001), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0. 970 (95% CI: 0. 912–0. 994; p < 0. 0001). We found 90. 9–98. 4% and 73. 6–87. 2% prediction accuracy in the test and validation predictions, respectively. The strongest predictors were: AMELXᵣs17878486 and TUFT1ᵣs2337360 (in both LogReg and NN), MMP16ᵣs1042937 (in NN) and ENAMᵣs12640848 (in LogReg). Conclusions: Neural network prediction model might be a substantial tool for screening/early preventive treatment of patients at high risk of caries development in the early childhood. The knowledge of potential risk status could allow early targeted training in oral hygiene and modifications of eating habits.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Katarzyna Zaorska
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Tomasz Szczapa
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Maria Borysewicz‐Lewicka
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Genes
Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zaorska et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1a6b9e382248a451856eb5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12040462
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: