SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with similar risks of major cardiovascular and renal outcomes compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes, with a non-significant trend toward lower total mortality (HR 0.78).
Cohort (n=21,745)
Yes
21,745 adults with type 2 diabetes, eGFR ≥30 ml/min/1.73 m2, and BMI ≤45 kg/m2, followed for a median of 1.1 to 1.7 years.
SGLT-2 inhibitors vs GLP-1 receptor agonists
Total mortality — HR 0.78 (0.61-1.01), p=0.0641
Hazard Ratio: 0.78 (95% CI 0.61–1.01)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.7% vs 8.2%
p-value: p=0.0641
Abstract Background Major prospective randomized clinical safety trials have demonstrated beneficial effects of treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium–glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in people with type 2 diabetes and elevated cardiovascular risk, and recent clinical treatment guidelines therefore promote early use of these classes of pharmacological agents. In this Swedish nationwide observational study, we compared cardiorenal outcomes and safety of new treatment with GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i in people with type 2 diabetes. Methods We linked data from national Swedish databases to capture patient characteristics and outcomes and used propensity-score based matching to account for differences between the two groups. The treatments were compared using Cox regression models. Results We identified 9648 participants starting GLP-1RA and 12,097 starting SGLT-2i with median follow-up times 1.7 and 1.1 years, respectively. The proportion of patients with a history of MACE were 15.8%, and 17.0% in patients treated with GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i, respectively. The mean age was 61 years with 7.6 years duration of diabetes. Mean HbA1c were 8.3% (67.6 mmol/mol) and 8.3% (67.2 mmol/mol), and mean BMI 33.3 and 32.5 kg/m 2 in patients treated with GLP-1RA or SGLT-2i, respectively. The cumulative mortality risk was non-significantly lower in the group treated with SGLT-2i, HR 0.78 (95% CI 0.61–1.01), as were incident heart failure outcomes, but the risks of cardiovascular or renal outcomes did not differ. The risks of stroke and peripheral artery disease were higher in the SGLT-2i group relative to GLP-1RA, with HR 1.44 (95% CI 0.99–2.08) and 1.68 (95% CI 1.04–2.72), respectively. Conclusions This observational study suggests that treatment with GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i result in very similar cardiorenal outcomes. In the short term, treatment with GLP-1RA seem to be associated with lower risks of stroke and peripheral artery disease, whereas SGLT-2i seem to be nominally associated with lower risk of heart failure and total mortality.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Moa Lugner
University of Gothenburg
Naveed Sattar
AstraZeneca (United Kingdom)
Mervete Miftaraj
Centre of Registers Vastra Gotaland
Cardiovascular Diabetology
University of Glasgow
University of Gothenburg
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lugner et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes (n=21,745). SGLT-2 inhibitors vs. GLP-1 receptor agonists was evaluated on Total mortality (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-1.01, p=0.0641). SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with similar risks of major cardiovascular and renal outcomes compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes, with a non-significant trend toward lower total mortality (HR 0.78).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a217c6e5c0c8498e258118d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-021-01258-x