Which CTO PCI score best predicts procedural success in a real-world registry of expert and learning operators?
Patients undergoing chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a comprehensive national registry, including procedures performed by both expert and learning operators.
Application of 4 different CTO PCI scores (including CASTLE and CL scores)
Comparison among the 4 different CTO PCI scores
Prediction of chronic total occlusion procedural success (evaluated via c-statistic)
Current CTO PCI scores, including CASTLE and CL, offer only intermediate predictive value for procedural success in real-world practice involving operators of varying expertise.
Procedural percutaneous coronary intervention difficulty is not consistently depicted by available chronic total occlusion scores and is influenced by the characteristics of each chronic total occlusion cohort. In our study population, including expert and learning operators, the CASTLE score had slightly better overall performance along with CL score. However, we found only intermediate performance in the c-statistic predicting chronic total occlusion success among all scores.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pablo Salinas
Nieves Gonzalo
Víctor H. Moreno
PLoS ONE
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Universitat de València
Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer
University of Córdoba
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Salinas et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5724375589c71d767e689 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245898